Skip to content 
Common Injection Molding Defects and How to Prevent Them in the Design Phase
Most injection molding defects are not manufacturing problems. They are design problems that manufacturing cannot solve. Sink marks, warpage, short shots, and weld lines all have root causes in the part geometry, and the correct fix is a design change, not a process adjustment. Understanding why each defect occurs, and what design decision caused it, allows engineers to prevent them before tooling is cut rather than troubleshoot them afterward.
This guide covers the eight most common injection molding defects, their design-phase root causes, how to prevent them in the part geometry, and what process adjustments may reduce them if the design cannot be changed.
Defect Reference Table
The table below maps each defect to its root cause in design, the prevention approach, and the process-level fix available if the defect surfaces after tooling.
| Defect | Root Cause in Design | Prevention | Process Fix (after tooling) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sink marks | Thick walls, oversized ribs or bosses | Reduce rib thickness to 50-60% of wall; core-out thick sections | Increase packing pressure; extend cooling time |
| Warpage | Non-uniform wall thickness; asymmetric cooling | Uniform wall; symmetrical geometry; avoid long thin features | Adjust cooling; change gate location; post-mold fixtures |
| Short shots | Thin walls; inadequate gate size; long flow paths | Maintain minimum wall thickness; gate into thick sections | Increase melt temp; increase injection speed; add vents |
| Weld lines | Multiple flow fronts merging | Relocate gate; reduce number of gates; adjust flow path | Increase melt temp; increase pack pressure |
| Flash | Insufficient clamping force; damaged parting surface | Avoid features that force parting line to complex paths | Increase clamp tonnage; clean parting surfaces; adjust pack |
| Burn marks | Air traps; high shear heat at thin features | Add vents at flow endpoints; avoid dead-end thin features | Add ejector pin vents; reduce injection speed |
| Jetting | Gate positioned to direct flow across open cavity | Reposition gate to direct flow against a wall first | Reduce injection speed at gate; increase gate diameter |
| Delamination | Contaminated material; moisture in hygroscopic resins | Specify dry storage; pre-dry resin per material data sheet | Purge hopper; verify drying time and temperature |
The right-most column, Process Fix, is the last resort. Every defect in this table has a more reliable and less expensive solution in the design column. Process adjustments can reduce defect severity but rarely eliminate a defect whose root cause is a design issue.
The Most Costly Defects to Fix After Tooling
Sink Marks
A sink mark is a surface depression opposite a thick feature: a rib, boss, or abrupt thick wall section. The outer surface solidifies first. The thicker interior continues shrinking and pulls the surface inward. Sink marks are visible, affect cosmetic quality, and cannot be eliminated by process adjustment alone when the root cause is a rib or boss that is too thick relative to the nominal wall.
The fix is simple in design: keep rib thickness at 50 to 60 percent of the nominal wall, limit boss outer wall thickness to 60 percent of the nominal wall, and use core-outs to reduce thick sections. These rules are covered in detail in the DFM checklist for injection molded parts and the wall thickness guide.
Warpage
Warpage is caused by differential shrinkage: sections of the part that cool at different rates shrink by different amounts, creating internal stress that deforms the part after ejection. Non-uniform wall thickness is the primary design cause. Long, thin, flat parts are particularly susceptible because they have large surface areas over which small differential shrinkage produces significant deflection.
Design fixes include uniform wall thickness, symmetrical part geometry, and balanced gate location. Process fixes include optimizing cooling channel placement and using post-mold fixturing during cooling, but neither addresses the fundamental differential shrinkage from non-uniform design.
Short Shots
A short shot is an incomplete fill: the plastic solidifies before the mold cavity is fully filled. The defect occurs when walls are too thin for the plastic to flow through before freezing, when the gate is undersized, or when the flow path is too long relative to the wall thickness.
Prevention requires maintaining minimum wall thickness appropriate to the material and filling the mold from thick to thin sections through correct gate placement. Gate location and wall thickness are design decisions. Injection speed and melt temperature can compensate for marginal designs but cannot overcome severe flow restrictions.
Weld Lines
Weld lines are inherent wherever two flow fronts meet inside the mold. They appear as visible seams and represent structural weakness: polymer chains at the weld interface are not fully entangled, reducing strength by 10 to 50 percent in that location. Gate placement controls where flow fronts meet, which controls where weld lines appear. Moving a gate can shift a weld line away from a structural feature or cosmetic surface.
Defects That Can Be Addressed by Process Adjustment
Flash, burn marks, and jetting have design contributors but can often be reduced or eliminated through process changes without mold modification.
Flash occurs at the parting line when injection pressure exceeds clamping force or when the parting surface is damaged or poorly sealed. Increasing clamp tonnage, cleaning parting surfaces, or reducing pack pressure often eliminates flash without design changes.
Burn marks appear at the end of flow paths where compressed air cannot escape. Adding small ejector pin vents at flow endpoints is a minor mold modification that eliminates most burn marks. Reducing injection speed at the final stage of fill also reduces air compression.
Jetting, a serpentine flow defect visible at the gate area, occurs when injection flow shoots across an open cavity without immediate contact with a wall. Repositioning the gate to direct flow against a wall first, or reducing injection speed at gate entry, corrects jetting. RPM Fast reviews gate position and venting as part of every DFM review before tooling. These parameters are on the rapid injection molding service page.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the most common injection molding defects?
The most common injection molding defects are sink marks, warpage, short shots, weld lines, flash, and burn marks. Sink marks and warpage are usually caused by non-uniform wall thickness or oversized ribs and bosses. Short shots result from walls too thin to fill or inadequate gate sizing. Weld lines are inherent where flow fronts meet and are controlled by gate placement. Flash typically results from insufficient clamping force or a damaged parting surface.
How do you prevent sink marks in injection molded parts?
Preventing sink marks requires keeping rib thickness at 50 to 60 percent of the nominal wall thickness, limiting boss outer wall thickness to 60 percent of the nominal wall, and using core-outs to reduce local thick sections without changing external geometry. Sink marks cannot be reliably eliminated by process adjustment alone when the root cause is a design issue; they must be addressed in the part geometry before tooling is cut.
What causes warpage in injection molded parts?
Warpage is caused by differential shrinkage during cooling. Non-uniform wall thickness creates areas that cool at different rates and shrink by different amounts. Asymmetric part geometry, uneven cooling channel placement, and poor gate location are secondary causes. Warpage is difficult to eliminate by process adjustment alone; the fundamental fix is redesigning for uniform wall thickness and symmetrical geometry.
Can injection molding defects be fixed after tooling is cut?
Some defects can be reduced or eliminated by process adjustment after tooling: short shots may respond to higher melt temperature or injection speed, and burn marks may be addressed by adding vents. However, defects caused by design issues such as sink marks from oversized ribs, warpage from non-uniform walls, and weld lines from poor gate placement typically require mold modifications. Modifications to aluminum tooling cost hundreds to a few thousand dollars; modifications to steel tooling cost significantly more.
Preventing Defects Before Tooling
The most effective defect prevention program is a thorough DFM review before the mold is cut. Every defect in the reference table above has a design-phase prevention that costs nothing. The same fix after tooling costs hundreds to thousands of dollars and adds days or weeks to the program.
RPM Fast is ISO 9001:2015 certified and performs DFM review on every submitted design before any tooling begins. If your design is ready for review, request a quote from RPM Fast and we will return DFM feedback and pricing within 1 to 2 business days.
